Covid has put Governance at the heart of debates on development, but how has it changed the questions we ask?
Date of Publication: August 6, 2020
The aim of this blog is to suggest ways in which the ‘governance discourse’ (what a grand term!) is changing – indeed has already changed - as a result of Covid-19.
I know that blogs are supposed to be discursive and informal. Recently our office was privileged to have a session with that master-blogger, Duncan Green, who shared all his tricks and techniques on the art of blogging. However, just this once I am going to ignore everything he said and make my case in two tables.
But first a quick explanation is in order. I perceive (I may be wrong here) that Covid has changed both the focus and the urgency of the governance discourse more in the last six months than anything else has done over the last decade. I am aware I am (possibly hugely) exaggerating here, and I am so doing to make the point. It does seem to me that governance practitioners are now being challenged to transition from a general way of interpreting the world (a view that has clear relevance at every level and in every context), to a much more specific and focused set of questions regarding the immediate here and now Covid implications of that way of interpreting the world. Questions that were rather peripheral in donor-led development circles (the ones with which I am most familiar) now seem to be central: questions about what determines the effectiveness of state responses to Covid-19? what is happening to state accountability as elections are postponed and due process in procurements are side-stepped? what is happening to state authority as inequalities are increasingly laid bare? what is happening to the legitimacy of states as citizens lose faith in the fairness and competence of governments?
These are all real and pressing issues, and they are issues on which governance practitioners must have something to say. There have been many articles and papers published to date – each one looking at a particular aspect. This blog merely tries to present an overview.
So Table 1 summarises what - I suggest - were the five dominant pre-Covid ‘overarching’ governance questions. Table 2 presents my initial judgement of what the five post-Covid governance questions may be. A short conclusion brings the blog to an end. Thankfully.
Table 1: My governance life pre-Covid-19
|
Five pre-Covid issues |
The issues |
Questions asked by practitioners |
|
1 The grand historical sweep |
How does a strong, effective and accountable State come into being?
|
What should I prioritise as the core foundations of an effective state? How should I sequence interventions? What trade-offs may I have to make, and how do I decide? Given that growth and development always precedes ‘democratisation’, should I prioritise economic not political governance? How long does it take - my boss wants results in this three year project? |
|
2 The state of the State |
How can we assess the institutions and interests that make up the modern nation State?
|
How can I know what sort of political settlement is in place, and how can I tell when it is changing? Can I ever hope to influence elite deals and make them more pro-poor? Where do rents come from and to what extent do they drive the political economy? How can I find out about them? How much ‘development’ can I expect anyway in this excessively patrimonial state? Or maybe I focus on bureaucratic capacity and forget about voice and accountability? |
|
3 Constraints to inclusive growth |
What are the major governance and institutional constraints to growth and poverty reduction?
|
Does the regime face internal or external threats that cannot be assuaged by aid or domestic resource rents? Should I design interventions around individuals or coalitions of reformers? What happens when reformers move on or die? Do I understand the ‘business model’ of rent seeking? |
|
4 The challenge of public service delivery |
What are the institutional characteristics of the good or service we are considering and does this imply a particular sort of intervention modality?
|
Do the services I want to improve require simple organisational change, or will it require more complex institutional change? Should I bother with transformational upstream, centre of government reforms, or just go with transactional incremental change sector by sector? Do I pin all my hopes on a few ‘champions of change’? Do I go all out for capacity development - and if so how – or do I need to think more about accountability and the emergence of a performance culture? |
|
5 More effective projects |
How can we design and implement projects that are flexible, and which respond and adapt to changing institutional and political environments?
|
Should I start with the problem or an objective? Can I really say PDIA out loud without colleagues groaning? How do I know I have identified the ‘right’ problem? How can I avoid the tyranny of the project framework? What on earth does it mean to be a searcher not a planner? What alternative modalities are at my disposal? How can I recognise development entrepreneurs and what do I do if I spot one? How can I work adaptively when the donor demands annual work plans and budgets? |
Table 2: What may become my governance life post-Covid
|
Five post-Covid issues |
The issues |
Questions now being asked by colleagues |
|
1 States have become more introspective, competitive and distrustful |
To what extent will the liberal ‘rules-based’ order survive? What other forms of unilateralism, bilateralism and regionalism will prevail?
|
How can I even begin to answer this question! Is aid and development now a global competition? If so the odds seem stacked against me…. What can our programs do to contribute to greater trust between (insert donor country) and partners? Should we do more to promote trade, cultural or sporting links?
|
|
2 Explaining wide variations in State responsiveness |
What influences the extent to which states’ responses are led by reason, evidence and data?
|
How can I explain differing levels of acceptance by political elites of ‘the science’ of the pandemic? Do I think this mean there will be an increased demand for evidence in other (non-Covid) aspects of public policy? To what extent has deference to authority played a role in the effectiveness of state Covid-19 responses? Are governance practitioners at last going to engage with hitherto taboo issues of national culture? Will states be more responsive to the inequalities thrown into sharp relief by Covid?
|
|
3 What will be the impact on State political accountability?
|
Will Covid-19 offer states the opportunity to reduce their exposure to public accountability, scrutiny, and criticism?
|
What is going to happen in the US come November? What happens to my governance program if States enact new laws or extend existing ones, taking more power to themselves? What do I advise if elections in ‘my’ country are to be postponed or suspended, or voter registration is to be halted, and electoral rolls not updated?....? Are these safe and sensible or an assault on democratic freedoms? What should I do if opposition parties / voices are shuttered, and media freedoms curtailed? How can I tell if the social contract is coming under pressure? Do all these trends mean I should recommend a shift away from ‘State-building’ to ‘democracy promotion’? |
|
4 What will be the impact on State political authority? |
What will be the medium-term results of continued / extended State failure to respond to social distress, increasing poverty and greater social and economic inequality?
|
How do states weigh up the cost of the economic lockdown against the risks of increased Covid cases and deaths? How long can states fund significantly increased social protection expenditures and innovations? What may be the social consequences in the rich world if unemployment remains at historically unprecedented levels? What will happen if citizens feel their ‘State’ has deserted them? What chance is there of violent confrontation?
|
|
5 More effective projects This one refuses to go away. As long as there is ‘aid’ it probably never will…. |
How can we design and implement projects that are flexible, and which respond and adapt to changing institutional and political environments?
|
Should I start with the problem or an objective? Can I really say PDIA out loud without colleagues groaning? How do I know I have identified the ‘right’ problem? How can I avoid the tyranny of the project framework? What on earth does it mean to be a searcher not a planner? What alternative modalities are at my disposal? How can I recognise development entrepreneurs and what do I do if I spot one? How can I work adaptively when the donor demands annual work plans and budgets? |
Conclusions
It is not that any of the five ‘pre-Covid’ questions have been answered or have gone away. Far from it – we know they haven’t. But it does seem that Covid-19 has upended the contemporary governance discourse and inserted a bunch of much more urgent, shorter-term and more politically pertinent questions. If we are thinking and working politically then maybe Covid-19 offers an opportunity for governance practitioners to play a key role in identifying ‘post-Covid’ recovery strategies, and address some of the issues identified in Table 2.
This article was first published on https://oxfamblogs.org 5th August 2020
Post a Comment
Sign in to post a comment
Comment(s)
Profile of Author(s)
About Graham Teskey
.jpg)
Principal Technical Lead – Governance | Abt Associates
Email: Graham.Teskey@abtassoc.com.au
.jpg)
.jpg)